From e8b6a70c3f19fdf59f402bff1540fde100f70fc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sajolida Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 05:06:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] --- ...comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn index f8518a7ba..4febf0443 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn @@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ While working on our forum I was surprised to see that some of the comments were > I'm seeing some comments in the rss feed. The feed is limited to the 25 > most recent items, you can increase that with feedshow. --[[Joey]] +>> Of course, but in the feed, some of the new comments don't show up. +>> Most does but not all. For example, none of the comments of this thread +>> appears in the RSS, even though they should according to the « 25 most +>> recent items » criteria: +>> + Then I found out that a map directive such as `!map pages="forum/* or comment(forum/*)"` was bringing a weird result too. The output is a map with quite a few broken links. @@ -11,6 +17,9 @@ with quite a few broken links. > internal page with a [[ikiwiki/WikiLink]] -- you'd get a broken link > or a create link because these are not true wiki pages. --[[Joey]] +>> So I don't understand why 90 % of the comments are linked well and 10 % +>> are broken links. Why does this map behave differently for only a few comments? + Plus, some broken links in the map do match the comments missing on the RSS feed but some others do not. Unfortunately, I couldn't find an obvious pattern for this failure. -- 2.26.2