From d25ddda9246935849dbd3860d3848acde495ef11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://lj.rossia.org/users/imz/" Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:37:53 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Referred to related discussions. --- doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn b/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn index d9133b4aa..faeb7192a 100644 --- a/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ See also: > >The first use case is handled by having a template in the page creation. You could + >have some type of form to edit the data, but that's just sugar on top of the template. >If you were going to have a web form to edit the data, I can imagine a few ways to do it: > @@ -246,7 +247,7 @@ in a large number of other cases. > or, if you applied the patch in [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] then you can use 'defined pagespecs' > such as `data_link(Depends on,~openBugs)`. The ability to label links like this allows separation of > dependencies between bugs from arbitrary links. - +>> This is issue (the need for distinguished kinds of links) has also been brought up in other discussions: [[tracking_bugs_with_dependencies#another_kind_of_links]] (deps vs. links) and [[tag_pagespec_function]] (tags vs. links). --Ivan Z. ---- #!/usr/bin/perl -- 2.26.2