From cd4616e39473a76854158fe3dfd1fc995389e1bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://www.google.com/profiles/schmonz" Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:22:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] clarify my horrible idea --- doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn index 57ab95985..8cebfec90 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn @@ -36,5 +36,6 @@ and a whitelist of OpenIDs in `locked_pages`...) >>> would never see the Signin form. --[[Joey]] >>>> Would I be able to do what I want with a local plugin that ->>>> knows my auth requirements and abuses canedit -- e.g., if the page ->>>> matches */Discussion, redirect to Signin form, else httpauth? --[[schmonz]] +>>>> abuses canedit (and auth) to reach in and call the appropriate +>>>> plugin's auth method -- e.g., if the page matches */Discussion, +>>>> call `openid:auth()`, else `httpauth:auth()`? --[[schmonz]] -- 2.26.2