From 3f104d1eb7cc15dec0d3a7a67db85fbe63484281 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PeteG Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:30:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn index e0c6ebdf1..900d98591 100644 --- a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn @@ -69,8 +69,11 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above. >>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few fixes in there >>> (and fixed all the indention..). Issues I noticed but have not gotten >>> to: --[[Joey]] +>>>> Please change the git pointer above, then. I will work on your branch. -- [[peteg]] >>> >>> * `rcs_diff` already exists; why add `rcs_showpatch`? +>>>> If `rcs_diff` is intended for human consumption, by all means we can use that. -- [[peteg]] + >>> * Would it be better for `rcs_revert` to not commit, and >>> `rcs_commit_staged` to then be used? This would work for git, but >>> maybe other RCSs would be problimatic. It would simplifiy the @@ -79,6 +82,9 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above. >>> needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running >>> in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need >>> `git show` to run in a subdir at all.. +>>>> I was aping (preserving) what was already there. I don't understand what you say about `git show` - it must run under $srcdir, surely? And empirically the CGI process wasn't in the right place. By all means simplify that. -- [[peteg]] + >>> * Probably needs to untaint the revs passed in. >>> * Seems backwards for `rcs_preprevert` to import and >>> use `IkiWiki::Receive`. +>>>> Indeed. This is saying that the checking code in IkiWiki::Receive is in the wrong place. I think it would be better to set up some general hooks and shuffle it into a plugin, for then other plugins that maintain special files in the repo can have a say about validity. -- [[peteg]] -- 2.26.2