From 0d947d38513cbfd32f76b2245cb8583237e96678 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:15:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] branch implementing my keyword suggestion --- doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn b/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn index 0a63940ce..f6e5a9a4d 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/octal_umask_setting_is_unintuitive.mdwn @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ you have to use one of and if you try to say 022 you'll get 22 decimal = 026 octal. +[[!tag patch]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/umask-keywords author="[[smcv]]"]] + Perhaps the best way to solve this would be to have keywords for the few values of `umask` that are actually useful? -- 2.26.2