attempt to clear up the bugs list a bit
authorSimon McVittie <smcv@ http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/>
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:21:02 +0000 (19:21 +0100)
committerSimon McVittie <smcv@ http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/>
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:21:02 +0000 (19:21 +0100)
doc/bugs/map_fails_to_close_ul_element_for_empty_list.mdwn
doc/bugs/prettydate_with_weekday-date_inconsistency.mdwn

index b1f8ed2b31cbcc6d08bcfcb40ed45225a8bbe1ea..4ce257252fd96114ac5aedca9c4c2f5c78138c81 100644 (file)
@@ -33,3 +33,8 @@ Patch[[!tag patch]]:
      
 
 -- [[Jon]]
+
+> Strictly speaking, a `<ul>` with no `<li>`s isn't valid HTML either...
+> could `map` instead delay emitting the first `<ul>` until it determines that
+> it will have at least one item? Perhaps refactoring that function into
+> something easier to regression-test would be useful. --[[smcv]]
index 111ade8dd28675ea79201c83f97d8cf9dda8c504..430d65a3fa45d30d0c1c9085f9dd6b3559c7fe23 100644 (file)
@@ -28,3 +28,5 @@ Prettydate creates strings like this: _Last edited in the wee hours of Tuesday n
 > --[[Joey]]
 
 >> fair enough, I think I can get converted to a warped time perspective. --ulrik
+
+>>> Perhaps we can consider this [[done]], then? --[[smcv]]