X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?p=ikiwiki.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=doc%2Ftodo%2Fweb_reversion.mdwn;h=841fc3703952ef3d27042ea93d55296de36ae211;hp=784b72e0550b66378492da8923b0cee1908b2590;hb=06f5382faadad254c2387dd2a57ddfed0482ebaa;hpb=238e8b95a5b084e7131d3314b78419b9404cba4c;ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
index 784b72e05..841fc3703 100644
--- a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
@@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ Implementation plan:
   and refresh site.
 
 Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
-[[!template id=gitbranch branch=peteg/revert author="[[peteg]]"]]
+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=peteg/revert author="[[users/peteg]]"]]
 
->> It is on a separate branch now. --[[peteg]]
+>> It is on a separate branch now. --[[users/peteg]]
 
 > Review: --[[Joey]] 
 > 
 > The revert commit will not currently say what web user did the revert.
 > This could be fixed by doing a --no-commit revert first and then using
 > rcs_commit_staged.
->> Fixed, I think. --[[peteg]]
+>> Fixed, I think. --[[users/peteg]]
 >
 > So I see one thing I completly forgot about is `check_canedit`. Avoiding users
 > using reverting to make changes they would normally not be allowed to do is
@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
 > structure that `rcs_recieve` does. This could be done by using `git revert
 > --no-commit`, and then examining the changes, and then `git reset` to drop
 > them.
->> We can use the existing `git_commit_info` with the patch ID - no need to touch the working directory. -- [[peteg]]
+>> We can use the existing `git_commit_info` with the patch ID - no need to touch the working directory. -- [[users/peteg]]
 > 
 > Then the code that is currently in IkiWiki/Receive.pm, that calls
 > `check_canedit` and `check_canremove` to test the change, can be
 > straightforwardly refactored out, and used for checking reverts too.
->> Wow, that was easy. :-) -- [[peteg]]
+>> Wow, that was easy. :-) -- [[users/peteg]]
 > 
 > (The data from `rcs_preprevert` could also be used for a confirmation
 > prompt -- it doesn't currently include enough info for diffs, but at
@@ -62,22 +62,12 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
 >> Taken care of by refactoring `rcs_receive` in `git.pm`
 >> I've tested it lightly in my single-user setup. It's a little nasty that the `attachment` plugin
 >> gets used to check whether attachments are allowed -- there really should be a hook for that.
+>>> I agree, but have not figured out a way to make a hook work yet.
+>>> --[[Joey]] 
 >>
->> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[peteg]]
+>> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[users/peteg]]
 
->>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few fixes in there
->>> [[!template id=gitbranch branch=origin/revert author="[[joey]]"]]
->>> (and fixed all the indention..). Issues I noticed but have not gotten
->>> to: --[[Joey]] 
->>>> Please change the git pointer above, then. I will work on your branch. -- [[peteg]]
+>>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few^Wseveral fixes in there.
+>>> All merged to master now! --[[Joey]] 
 
->>> * I quite don't understand why one caller of `git_parse_changes`
->>>   needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running
->>>   in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need
->>>   `git show` to run in a subdir at all..
->>>> I was aping (preserving) what was already there. I don't understand what you say about `git show` - it must run under $srcdir, surely? And empirically the CGI process wasn't in the right place. By all means simplify that. -- [[peteg]]
-
->>> * Probably needs to untaint the revs passed in.
->>> * Seems backwards for `rcs_preprevert` to import and
->>>   use `IkiWiki::Receive`.
->>>> Indeed. This is saying that the checking code in IkiWiki::Receive is in the wrong place. I think it would be better to set up some general hooks and shuffle it into a plugin, for then other plugins that maintain special files in the repo can have a say about validity. -- [[peteg]]
+[[done]]