I think there's a bug in the code that determines if the cgiurl is relative
to the url. If one has a different port than the other, they're not
relative, and I hear Fil encountered an issue where the wrong port was then
used. --[[Joey]] 

> I tested, setting cgiurl to a nonstandard port. After rebuilding,
> pages used the full url. So I don't see a bug here, or am missing
> something from my memory of the report (which was done the bad way, on
> IRC). [[done]] --[[Joey]]