From ffcfdf5330ff819929cef6d6e32e99a082f89b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:03:35 +2100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: notmuch-search-toggle-order and notmuch-tree --- c0/cf99b3afb378ed564736dce17d37acd9971813 | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 c0/cf99b3afb378ed564736dce17d37acd9971813 diff --git a/c0/cf99b3afb378ed564736dce17d37acd9971813 b/c0/cf99b3afb378ed564736dce17d37acd9971813 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b03fbf4bb --- /dev/null +++ b/c0/cf99b3afb378ed564736dce17d37acd9971813 @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88746DE8913 + for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 05:11:32 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.007 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, + SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 679SRPG904Xn for ; + Mon, 15 Aug 2016 05:11:24 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75D66DEAA0E + for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 05:04:10 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) + (envelope-from ) + id 1bZGcP-0006FF-Sr; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:03:49 -0400 +Received: (nullmailer pid 28202 invoked by uid 1000); + Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:03:35 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , + notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: notmuch-search-toggle-order and notmuch-tree +In-Reply-To: <87zioj17bj.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> +References: <87zioj17bj.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:03:35 -0300 +Message-ID: <878tvy8ciw.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:11:33 -0000 + +"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: + +> I was expecting notmuch-tree to also follow the search +> order(oldest-first or not). But with latest notmuch +> even after i change the search order using notmuch-serach-toggle-order a +> tree view always list with the default search order. Is that expected ? + +Maybe Mark can give a more informed comment but I would say that it's +expected from a code point of view, as the tree code does not reference +the variable notmuch-search-oldest-first. This lack of control over the +display order of threads (as opposed to within the threads) does seem +like a missing feature. + +d -- 2.26.2