From fd24224116d35d4ec1c5bc71050c2775fe676bf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Felipe Contreras Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:30:14 +1900 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings --- 3b/80070ae34324c15fcd9e56d0cf3e9e7b75ab2e | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) create mode 100644 3b/80070ae34324c15fcd9e56d0cf3e9e7b75ab2e diff --git a/3b/80070ae34324c15fcd9e56d0cf3e9e7b75ab2e b/3b/80070ae34324c15fcd9e56d0cf3e9e7b75ab2e new file mode 100644 index 000000000..db44efbc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/3b/80070ae34324c15fcd9e56d0cf3e9e7b75ab2e @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2288D431FAF + for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:30:21 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id knbFmDBVEYZU for ; + Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com + [209.85.217.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E88431FAE + for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r11so1609968lbv.16 + for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:30:14 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id + :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; + bh=nxzxtOf6j4OxeVGZDcXNKQtKO3fWMqez+l5H+jbmfRs=; + b=0+naaU3QhktHxWiyNJpjqirf/hUTpdvTmnyl2Ay4rQv+hKsST1BDlfMDPqxvQHaVy8 + K3iykyIVSSlcBpf33ZKZZHUTMziw6I/q8owqnXm6fN9u1NaB7Qva0GGAqq2/D5PHlzmr + oivy5W83QhPgiW3X+WNpRF8j9EQDziVpatXOkzfNwQijac5hbirfxPqKJboRAKvaHmkx + WX4R4Bt/FsgD74kqfZLkiEnhXCd1ZayQEfBH6sUAaYrg1E55dUCtY5DQTmRROxbfuz+G + NROFkYSCOb5HdtGgrziCxK9ketnbe1a++YKgwnMmpVgaY0zXP6T2M1MNI8KTMg1O2yeV + 0QxQ== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.112.163.6 with SMTP id ye6mr27093017lbb.59.1367260214492; + Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:30:14 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:30:14 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <87fvy9kxr9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> +References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> + <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <87fvy9kxr9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> +Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:30:14 -0500 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings +From: Felipe Contreras +To: Carl Worth +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, David Bremner +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:30:21 -0000 + +On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Carl Worth wrote: +> Felipe Contreras writes: +>>> My hypothetical laziness is not the reason. It was at the strong +>>> insistence of Carl that things are organized this way. +>> +>> I still don't see why we need to do that. The notmuch project +>> shouldn't be bound to the debian project. +> +> I'm not sure what your specific question is here. +> +> My strong insistence was that the Debian packaging stuff, (like +> debian/rules), be hosted in the main notmuch repository. + +Yeah, that's fine, but it's a different thing. + +One thing is to host the debian packaging there (I think it should be +packaging/debian, otherwise the .spec should also be in the top +directory, but that's no big deal), and another thing is to bind the +live packaging. + +So basically the notmuch project doesn't own debian/*, which I don't +think makes sense. + +> If that were separated to a separate repository (or a separate branch), +> then nothing in the current situation would change. Your proposed +> change, (which is to debian/rules if I read it correctly), would instead +> be directed at that separate repository/branch. + +I'm not proposing to so separate that directory to a separate +repository, I'm proposing to have a separate clone that is used for +the *live* packaging, that way the notmuch project can make changes to +debian/*, but only the package maintainer can merge them to the +'debian' specific branch, or repository in order to trigger the live +packaging. + +Cheers. + +-- +Felipe Contreras -- 2.26.2