From fc7bd5114d4f91b1985d187c1bdc5a4c8250f383 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:56:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] web commit by JeremyReed: more replies --- doc/index/discussion.mdwn | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/index/discussion.mdwn b/doc/index/discussion.mdwn index 3fadbcbeb..0539a6f75 100644 --- a/doc/index/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/index/discussion.mdwn @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ This is using my custom rcs.pm which has been used thousands of times. > version 2.3. The only other way it could happen is if ikiwiki does not > have saved state about the page that it's editing (in .ikiwiki/index). +>> Rebuilt it several times. Now that I think of it, I think my early problem of having +>> no content in the textbox was before I rebuilt the cgi. And after I rebuilt the whole webpage was empty. + Now I regenerated my ikiwiki.cgi again (no change to my configuration, and I just get an empty HTML page when attempting editing or "create". @@ -88,6 +91,10 @@ Is there any webpage with upgrade steps? > Users are expected to read [[news]], which points out any incompatible > changes or cases where manual action is needed. +>> I read it but read the userdirs option wrong :(. +>> Also it appears to be missing the news from between 1.40 to 2.0 unless they dont' exist. +>> If they do exist maybe they have release notes I need? + --JeremyReed My followup: I used a new ikiwiki.setup based on the latest version. But no changes for me. @@ -109,6 +116,8 @@ on changes to revision control modules. Has something changed? I will also look. > No, the rcs interface has not needed to change in a long time. Also, > nothing is done with the rcs for do=prefs. +>> Thanks. I also checked differences between 1.40 Rcs plugins and didn't notice anything significant. + --JeremyReed Another Followup: I created a new ikiwiki configuration and did the --setup to -- 2.26.2