From fb7a2033a2d17bef0ccb14a7510b8c63ca50985a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:58:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] calibcant/overview.tex: Give a road map for the rest of this
 chapter

---
 src/calibcant/overview.tex | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/calibcant/overview.tex b/src/calibcant/overview.tex
index f70f33a..b47a10f 100644
--- a/src/calibcant/overview.tex
+++ b/src/calibcant/overview.tex
@@ -75,6 +75,17 @@ buffer temperature $T$ with a thermocouple
 when the tip is far from the surface to extract the fit parameters
 $G_{1f}$, $f_0$, and $\beta_f$ (\cref{sec:calibcant:vibration}).
 
+Although this theory should be well established
+(\cref{sec:calibcant:survey}), there is continued confusion about the
+details of the fitting (\cref{sec:calibcant:lorentzian}).  To avoid
+further ambiguity, I'll derive the power spectral density mentioned
+above (\cref{eq:psd-Vp,eq:avg-Vp-Gone-f})
+in \cref{sec:calibcant:theory}.  In \cref{calibcant/procedure}, I'll
+introduce my \calibcant\ package for automatically calibrating
+cantilevers.  I'll clear up a few remaining points
+in \cref{sec:calibcant:discussion} before wrapping up
+with \cref{sec:calibcant:conclusions}.
+
 \section{Related work}
 \label{sec:calibcant:survey}
 
-- 
2.26.2