From f78b629458b2662a66635b1ad29d34ef37bfc773 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "W. Trevor King" Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:17:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] calibcant/discussion.tex: Finish error propogation paragraph Replace "TODO" with "kappa shouldn't change", since I go right into quoting numbers later on. --- src/calibcant/discussion.tex | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex index 954c895..6f1eb23 100644 --- a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex +++ b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ uncertainty in each parameter (\cref{fig:calibcant:statistics}). Values for $\sigma_p$ and $\avg{V_p^2}$ are quite sensitive to the location of the laser spot on the cantilever, so they can vary over large time scales as the microscope alignment drifts (e.g.~due to -thermal expansion as the room warms up). However TODO +thermal expansion as the room warms up). However, the calculated +value for $\kappa$ should not vary significantly. For example, on a recent calibration run\footnote{2013-02-07T08-20-46} I measured $\sigma_p=35.68\pm0.87\U{V/$\mu$m}$, -- 2.26.2