From f3eb2f9737d69e25a8883322e5eb34a7c8047cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "W. Trevor King" Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:25:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Explain residual panel of calibcant bump figure.. --- posts/calibcant.mdwn_itex | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/posts/calibcant.mdwn_itex b/posts/calibcant.mdwn_itex index 05581d6..9844bc4 100644 --- a/posts/calibcant.mdwn_itex +++ b/posts/calibcant.mdwn_itex @@ -42,7 +42,9 @@ The contact region of surface bumps can be fit with either linear or quadratic models. Here is an example of a single surface bump fit with a quadratic model. The green line is the initial guess (before fitting), the red line is the final model (after fitting), and the -blue dots are measured data points. +blue dots are measured data points. The red dots in the bottom panel +are the residual, which looks cubic because we've subtracted a +quadratic model. [[!img bump.png alt="Surface bump for photodiode sensitivity" title="Surface bump for photodiode sensitivity" ]] -- 2.26.2