From ec566c02fdf4e1f76e6559afbb8c01ec772412f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:57:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] response --- doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn index cbc046d98..30ede95a6 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ Any thoughts on this? >> Can you please do this? If not, I'll go on and hope I'm not going to far in >> the wrong direction. >> +>>> Sure.. I'm not completly happy with any of the hooks since they're very +>>> special purpose, and also since `run_hooks` is not the best interface +>>> for a hook that modifies a variable, where only the last hook run will +>>> actually do anything. It might be better to just wrap +>>> `targetpage`, `bestlink`, and `beautify_urlpath`. But, I noticed +>>> the other day that such wrappers around exported functions are only visible by +>>> plugins loaded after the plugin that defines them. +>> >> The Discussion pages issue is something I am not sure about yet. But I will >> probably decide that "slave" pages, being only translations, don't deserve >> a discussion page: the discussion should happen in the language in which the -- 2.26.2