From e90e65c6669222d986e9d4ca250b81cbb3f2e3dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:14:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] web commit by tuomov: Please, for the love of clear syntax, no! --- doc/todo/Support__47__Switch_to_MultiMarkdon.mdwn | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/Support__47__Switch_to_MultiMarkdon.mdwn b/doc/todo/Support__47__Switch_to_MultiMarkdon.mdwn index a1c71e435..0f05af116 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Support__47__Switch_to_MultiMarkdon.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Support__47__Switch_to_MultiMarkdon.mdwn @@ -25,4 +25,6 @@ MultiMarkdown would solve the BibTex request and the multiple output formats wou [MultiMarkdown Homepage](http://fletcher.freeshell.org/wiki/MultiMarkdown) -> I don't think MultiMarkdown solves [[the BibTeX request|todo/BibTeX]], but it might solve the request for LaTeX output. --[[JoshTriplett]] \ No newline at end of file +> I don't think MultiMarkdown solves [[the BibTeX request|todo/BibTeX]], but it might solve the request for LaTeX output. --[[JoshTriplett]] + +> Unless there's a way to disable a zillion of the features, please **no**. Do _not_ switch to it. One thing that I like about markdown as opposed to most other ASCII markup languages, is that it has at least a bit of moderation on the syntax (although it could be even simpler). There's not a yet another reserved character lurking behind every corner. Not so in multimarkdown anymore. Footnotes, bibliography and internal references I could use, and they do not add any complex syntax: it's all inside the already reserved sequences of bracketed stuff. (If you can even say that ASCII markup languages have reserved sequences, as they randomly decide to interpret stuff, never actually failing on illegal input, like a proper language to write any serious documentation in, would do.) But tables, math, and so on, no thanks! Too much syntax! Syntax overload! Bzzzt! I don't want mischievous syntaxes lurking behind every corner, out to get me. --[[tuomov]] -- 2.26.2