From e7ad4a9c3c9d383d1df52410e18808174f7be667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:20:40 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] count-delta.c: comment fixes There was a stale comment that explains why the old code could undercount when delta data copied things around inside detination buffer. We do not use that kind of delta, so the comment does not apply. --- count-delta.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/count-delta.c b/count-delta.c index 978a60ca9..058a2aadb 100644 --- a/count-delta.c +++ b/count-delta.c @@ -16,11 +16,7 @@ * * Number of bytes that are _not_ copied from the source is deletion, * and number of inserted literal bytes are addition, so sum of them - * is the extent of damage. xdelta can express an edit that copies - * data inside of the destination which originally came from the - * source. We do not count that in the following routine, so we are - * undercounting the source material that remains in the final output - * that way. + * is the extent of damage. */ int count_delta(void *delta_buf, unsigned long delta_size, unsigned long *src_copied, unsigned long *literal_added) -- 2.26.2