From e788154ef36c4691f49af316925bc50683ae2bb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:55:55 +2100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Breaking a really long thread --- d9/374dddd729d4333a3de2bca3da088a333f603c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 d9/374dddd729d4333a3de2bca3da088a333f603c diff --git a/d9/374dddd729d4333a3de2bca3da088a333f603c b/d9/374dddd729d4333a3de2bca3da088a333f603c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f54cc4779 --- /dev/null +++ b/d9/374dddd729d4333a3de2bca3da088a333f603c @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481666DE00BD + for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:56:25 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.019 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[AWL=-0.008, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 6Er0D5Pkb4Yl for ; + Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:56:15 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4522C6DE02D5 + for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:55:59 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) + (envelope-from ) + id 1aoy3C-0005of-CA; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:56:06 -0400 +Received: (nullmailer pid 4334 invoked by uid 1000); + Sat, 09 Apr 2016 18:55:55 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , + David Mazieres expires 2016-07-03 PDT + , + notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: Breaking a really long thread +In-Reply-To: <8760vrm3jk.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> +References: + <87k2kd8r6d.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87wpoc7hf8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> + <8760vrm3jk.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 15:55:55 -0300 +Message-ID: <87fuuu3938.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 18:56:25 -0000 + +Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: + +> On Tue 2016-04-05 01:28:43 -0400, David Mazieres wrote: +>> Arguably, I would say either both the In-Reply-To and the References +>> header should be hidden or neither. Otherwise, what was happening is +>> that I was deleting the In-Reply-To header as it was the only one I saw, +>> and figuring that maybe References was adjusted after the fact based on +>> In-Reply-To. After all, the message buffer doesn't keep track of the +>> parent message. +>> +>> Unless there's a reason that someone would want to alter In-Reply-To +>> without altering References, it doesn't make sense to show one without +>> the other. +> +> I think i agree with David here, but the fact is that +> message-hidden-headers is derived directly from emacs (in message.el), +> and isn't part of notmuch-emacs at all. +> +> Are these changes worth addressing upstream? + +Possibly. Although changing defaults is usually a cesspit of +bikeshedding. What would we ask, that upstream add In-Reply-To to +message-hidden-headers? + +Related, showing hidden headers doesn't actually work very well: + + http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23252 + +I thought briefly about overriding the value in notmuch-message-mode, +perhaps by having a defcustom for notmuch-message-hidden-headers. + +d -- 2.26.2