From dd4dff03506c5c8f9dee1fa59548e4e653bb0053 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://dtrt.org/" Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:06:21 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Workaround and possible cause --- .../inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn index e8befe8d5..6357acdee 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn @@ -26,3 +26,17 @@ If I instead include them using creation_year in the pagespec, they are ordered contains the src used to reproduce this, the precise ikiwiki invocation (inside Makefile) and the results (dest). -- [[users/Jon]] + + +> On Ikiwiki 2.53.3 (Debian Lenny), my inlines are also sorted using mtime +> by default -- despite what the [[documentation|/ikiwiki/directive/inline]] +> says -- but setting the supposed default sort order manually produces the +> correct results. For example, the following inline sorts my blog +> entires using their meta date or ctime: +> +> inline pages="blog/*" show="10" sort="age" +> +> I'll try to look at the code this weekend and see if age is really the +> default sort order. +> +> -- [David A. Harding](http://dtrt.org), 2008-12-20 -- 2.26.2