From daaf4885384568822c9a134f28cee667b6940d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: intrigeri Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:53:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] po: let's walk the last steps needed before merge! Signed-off-by: intrigeri --- doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn index edd665185..af748a8d3 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn @@ -171,3 +171,30 @@ Any thoughts on this? I've set this plugin development aside for a while. I will be back and finish it at some point in the first quarter of 2009. --[[intrigeri]] + +> Abstract: Joey, please have a look at my po and meta branches. +> +> Detailed progress report: +> +> * it seems the po branch in your repository has not been tracking my +> own po branch for two months. any config issue? +> * all the plugin's todo items have been completed, robustness tests +> done +> * I've finished the detailed security audit, and the fix for po4a +> bugs has entered upstream CVS last week +> * I've merged your new `checkcontent` hook with the `cansave` hook +> I previously introduced in my own branch; blogspam plugin updated +> accordingly +> * the rename hook changes we discussed elsewhere are also part of my +> branch +> * I've introduced two new hooks (`canremove` and `canrename`), not +> a big deal; IMHO, they extend quite logically the plugin interface +> * as highlighted on [[bugs/pagetitle_function_does_not_respect_meta_titles]], +> my `meta` branch contains a new feature that is really useful in a +> translatable wiki +> +> As a conclusion, I'm feeling that my branches are ready to be +> merged; only thing missing, I guess, are a bit of discussion and +> subsequent adjustments. +> +> --[[intrigeri]] -- 2.26.2