From d498f93dcaf0629291af14e92b5975c8f8d4c162 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Suvayu Ali Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:58:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Re: the future of notmuch-vim? --- 64/30228a74524d9021d2494e6c40afc2b18b7c66 | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 64/30228a74524d9021d2494e6c40afc2b18b7c66 diff --git a/64/30228a74524d9021d2494e6c40afc2b18b7c66 b/64/30228a74524d9021d2494e6c40afc2b18b7c66 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..78917b89e --- /dev/null +++ b/64/30228a74524d9021d2494e6c40afc2b18b7c66 @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520FE431FAF + for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id AiVLQSu6THQk for ; + Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:58:07 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com (mail-ee0-f43.google.com + [74.125.83.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client + certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id + EA0DD431FAE for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:58:06 -0700 + (PDT) +Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e50so769153eek.16 + for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to + :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition + :in-reply-to:user-agent; + bh=Tw5wD0mKcDN73mAkNBJq6GPwKo7KJ6pm0ySFamSa9QI=; + b=dGFKwJZdrS3zUY7PsI39fJUy7WSS9izq1uutWsgWIb1jw9gNmdfYJ/UichKDVh9kpN + QwyEJ88KAC6NEQQjdwAVdM8/iNxhnmHEGDsQWgEHFV6AxOWiYzDI9bNKKuNys2ZQSshs + jolEDYNw6WVw+IIDxdFbJT/r2HQNSBQPCUxooGehLmGKXwDmcQneHGLvNLZakKIhTwea + hSwec+aRUv7aAR5G+ikUco+HNv3Xf5DExWJ+eL8cDwHacgL19pLZ8DFJaFs9ZDwIGcXA + lbT/wAxRhyNGzsElqbm/msQFcP2sL0FgLyYm5ZQZAXjHdbgDktGjRiLUezvgkZWbwmEC + Svtw== +X-Received: by 10.14.216.2 with SMTP id f2mr4740081eep.44.1365008285698; + Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com (pb-d-128-141-52-173.cern.ch. + [128.141.52.173]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r4sm8487852eeo.12.2013.04.03.09.58.03 + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); + Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT) +Sender: suvayu ali +Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:58:00 +0200 +From: Suvayu Ali +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: the future of notmuch-vim? +Message-ID: <20130403165800.GI31109@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> +Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +References: <871udhcmks.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <515b37a1821fc_146e1045e1094149@nysa.mail> + <20130403060158.GJ7702@vilya.m0g.net> + <515bf1d3cdb5b_79f845e181791@nysa.mail> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <515bf1d3cdb5b_79f845e181791@nysa.mail> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:58:09 -0000 + +On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:09:39AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: +> guyzmo wrote: +> +> > I personnally prefer a thousand times to use mutt-kz, alot as MUA, and +> > vim only for writing mails. + +[...] + +> I've tried mutt-kz and alot, and I was utterly dissapointed by both. +> +> See how snappy and fast notmuch-vim-ruby is[1], alot is much worst in these +> respects. +> +> [1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGD7IbZmnIs + +I'm a mutt-kz user, and I am not a vim user. That said, I agree with +you that both mutt-kz and alot can be slow to start. Opening virtual +folders in mutt-kz is quite slow compared to regular maildirectories. +And there seems to be no solution yet. For example you can see this +message from Karel: + + + +-- +Suvayu + +Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- 2.26.2