From d1d7a48d5ac8e5e6b87fbf8f47fe4ee3127f2303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Blevins Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:08:06 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] response --- doc/news/git_push_to_this_wiki/discussion.mdwn | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/news/git_push_to_this_wiki/discussion.mdwn b/doc/news/git_push_to_this_wiki/discussion.mdwn index 252fe724a..f948ee6cf 100644 --- a/doc/news/git_push_to_this_wiki/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/news/git_push_to_this_wiki/discussion.mdwn @@ -24,3 +24,12 @@ in awful and various ways when it is not the case. Any alternative idea? > but I sometimes use `git pull --rebase` to pull changes from a repo. That > will rebase your local changes on top of the changes pulled, avoiding the > merge commits. I'm sure more involved solutions are possible. --[[Joey]] + +> I decided to use my local `master` branch as a copy of `origin/master` +> (kitenet) and move my local modifications to a separate branch. I'm using +> `master` to edit the wiki but there is still the problem of new upstream +> commits since the last pull. I already had this problem as Joey had pushed +> some changes while I was editing locally. Not knowing about +> `pull --rebase`, I took the long way out: branch, roll back HEAD, rebase, +> and merge. That was too much work...It looks like `pull --rebase` is the +> way to go. --[[JasonBlevins]] -- 2.26.2