From d1849a4deb0256f0ef60a04f123676bcba558120 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:21:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] close, cannot reproduce Perhaps fil will come back here and give details. --- doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn b/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn index 4a7dd21b6..dbe710399 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/bug_in_cgiurl_port.mdwn @@ -2,3 +2,8 @@ I think there's a bug in the code that determines if the cgiurl is relative to the url. If one has a different port than the other, they're not relative, and I hear Fil encountered an issue where the wrong port was then used. --[[Joey]] + +> I tested, setting cgiurl to a nonstandard port. After rebuilding, +> pages used the full url. So I don't see a bug here, or am missing +> something from my memory of the report (which was done the bad way, on +> IRC). [[done]] --[[Joey]] -- 2.26.2