From ccc504e646e323579086bcf23a2d88b74c870891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Allan Streib Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:42:09 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues --- 63/6ac252af9cfe22626251c61e29969d0ef02118 | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 63/6ac252af9cfe22626251c61e29969d0ef02118 diff --git a/63/6ac252af9cfe22626251c61e29969d0ef02118 b/63/6ac252af9cfe22626251c61e29969d0ef02118 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1d393c2f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/63/6ac252af9cfe22626251c61e29969d0ef02118 @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B628B431FB6 + for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:52:07 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.699 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 6f3hUFrpzsvf for ; + Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:51:58 -0700 (PDT) +X-Greylist: delayed 585 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra; + Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:51:58 PDT +Received: from hartman.uits.indiana.edu (belushi.uits.indiana.edu + [129.79.1.188]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDC3431FAF + for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:51:58 -0700 (PDT) +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,884,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="130292136" +Received: from mssg-relay.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.73]) + by irpt-internal-relay.indiana.edu with ESMTP; + 18 Apr 2014 08:42:11 -0400 +Received: from hartman.uits.indiana.edu (hartman.uits.indiana.edu + [129.79.1.194]) + by mssg-relay.indiana.edu (8.14.7/8.14.4/IU Messaging Team) with ESMTP + id s3ICgBIx026919; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:11 -0400 +X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,884,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="130597179" +Received: from candy.uits.indiana.edu (HELO mail-relay.iu.edu) + ([129.79.1.201]) by irpt-internal-relay.indiana.edu with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2014 + 08:42:11 -0400 +Received: from viking (156-56-93-99.dhcp-bl.indiana.edu [156.56.93.99]) + (authenticated bits=0) + by mail-relay.iu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.4/IU Messaging Team Submission) with + ESMTP id s3ICg9Cx015585 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 + verify=NO); Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:10 -0400 +Received: from localhost (1000@localhost [local]); + by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 8afe03ff; + Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:09 -0400 (EDT) +From: Allan Streib +To: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-16 PDT + +Subject: Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues +In-Reply-To: <878ur37b5l.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +References: <871twvokwm.fsf@viking.indiana.edu> + <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> + <878ur37b5l.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+186~g69867c3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-unknown-openbsd) +Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:42:09 -0400 +Message-ID: <87lhv27qse.fsf@indiana.edu> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 01:04:39 -0700 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:52:08 -0000 + +David Mazieres writes: + +> I'm using notmuch 0.17 on openbsd (from the ports tree). My problem is +> that notmuch new is just unbearably slow. I don't know if it's because +> I'm running the 32-bit (i386) mode or what, but it takes over one second +> per mail message. E.g., this is typical of what I see when checking for +> new mail: +> +> Processed 18 total files in 20s (0 files/sec.). +> Added 5 new messages to the database. +> +> Linux is 10 times faster. Have you seen any similar performance issues? + +I didn't realize there was a port. I don't see it in my tree (amd64, +recent 5.5-current). I've been building from the git repo. + +Anyway, yes I have seen similar on an older Mac OS X install I have at +home on a G4 PowerBook. I haven't had "unbearably" slow performance on +my amd64 OpenBSD installation, but there is sometimes a noticable lag. + +I wonder if it would help to enable softupdates on the partition where +your database lives? http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#SoftUpdates + +Allan + + + -- 2.26.2