From c08d925b16b4be7b96fe7ddb47eb561c3ca3bbc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:16:00 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: nmbug in the Debian packages? --- 76/c10829744aa81282683db06d73d5928013876a | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) create mode 100644 76/c10829744aa81282683db06d73d5928013876a diff --git a/76/c10829744aa81282683db06d73d5928013876a b/76/c10829744aa81282683db06d73d5928013876a new file mode 100644 index 000000000..017a7f4b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/76/c10829744aa81282683db06d73d5928013876a @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119226DE141B + for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:16:05 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.307 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, + RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id ManZFxpW4wZX for ; + Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:16:03 -0800 (PST) +Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BC86DE02C9 + for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:16:02 -0800 (PST) +Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) + (envelope-from ) + id 1aVfTL-0002lb-VN; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:15:20 -0500 +Received: (nullmailer pid 26072 invoked by uid 1000); + Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:16:00 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: "W. Trevor King" +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages? +In-Reply-To: <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us> +References: + <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us> + <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:16:00 -0400 +Message-ID: <87h9h8vlrj.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:16:05 -0000 + +"W. Trevor King" writes: + +> +> I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1]. Does that sound right? Or do +> folks prefer another name? +> + +I had a thought about this. The password manager "pass" uses + + pass git {push|pull} + +for git related operations. Perhaps that would make sense for us as +well? So initially "notmuch-git". I'm of course open to better ideas, +but especially since you pushed a bit to make the interface follow git +more closely, perhaps that's a more informative name than "dtag". It +also leaves open the possibility of stashing other metadata than tags, +should something like [1] come to pass. + +On the other hand, it's true that what we're doing is less transparent +than what pass does, which is really just pass the arguments straight +through to git. + +[1] id:1453561198-2893-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net -- 2.26.2