From b6e093156fd52dccdc49f81e6028a753e4a26aae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Lipp Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 22:41:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] emacs: add missing paren to fix defun in notmuch-address.el. --- bb/df805162767891583a3b7e7ccbab01b5beb4a0 | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bb/df805162767891583a3b7e7ccbab01b5beb4a0 diff --git a/bb/df805162767891583a3b7e7ccbab01b5beb4a0 b/bb/df805162767891583a3b7e7ccbab01b5beb4a0 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..69aed5f20 --- /dev/null +++ b/bb/df805162767891583a3b7e7ccbab01b5beb4a0 @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0D8431FBF + for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:42:17 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.099 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id FC24r+2I96rU for ; + Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB87E431FBD + for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fruiteater.riseup.net (fruiteater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.74]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (Client CN "*.riseup.net", + Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified)) + by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1236651B6B; + Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; + t=1404679328; bh=9coxL15bGohwK/5ybyPDb9/lHoXLiO3dIYw2QbNB494=; + h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: + MIME-Version:Content-Type; + b=qm86V0NKKMN6gCQdt99Zp3j+Ks/5gA7twWzrySiXkxfS/zCvZU+q67EaQnlTvsIXT + GZFSFNnaCnoU/nqdvfnxpMSwneGuxV7pUafMXVM8ujsIt7kIjIaN4ewEvczux3E3q3 + J6ui/oM34hQYs/ey+v6ib+KHYUheKS8LkUjHF6oA= +Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + (Authenticated sender: bacuh@fruiteater.riseup.net) + with ESMTPSA id A833C900 +From: Sebastian Lipp +To: Karl Fogel +Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add missing paren to fix defun in + notmuch-address.el. +In-Reply-To: <87d2djr7o1.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> +References: <87wqsfik5l.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> + <87mwtah2hd.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <877gkeau42.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> + <8738v1jtzc.fsf@nikula.org> + <87k3odgutd.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ip3wbj7g.fsf@mcs.anl.gov> + + <87vc7vgbym.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <87pphmc604.fsf@verb.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> + <87oax6vt4u.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com> + <87r4215vcd.fsf@verb.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> + <87d2djr7o1.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (i686-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 22:41:02 +0200 +Message-ID: + <878uo6dxup.fsf@verb.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1 +X-Virus-Status: Clean +Cc: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 20:42:17 -0000 + +Karl Fogel +> In general, supplying a log message with the patch with avoid such +> confusion. If there is some prose expressing what the change is +> supposed to to, and giving any historical context (such as the mailing +> list thread starting from last year), then it will be easy for any +> reviewer to understand what the patch is intended to do, and check if it +> actually does that. + +Okay, next time I will provide that information inline. Thought keeping +References and In-Reply-To headers would be sufficient reference. + -- 2.26.2