From b683c70b44e1e646081793209e3a644662a1e9e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://alcopop.org/me/openid/" Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:19:26 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] update with examples --- doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn index 8aea8d0ac..dfb9c6085 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -I have a directory containing two files. f1 has +I have a directory containing two files. f1 () has meta date="2008-07-02 14:13:17" -f2 has +f2 () has meta date="2008-07-02 21:04:21" @@ -19,10 +19,10 @@ Another page includes them both via inline. The inclusion pagespec is not based inline pages="2008/07/*/*" show=5 -The resulting page is rendered with f1 above f2, seemingly not using the meta directive information. The italic-footer in the inline pages does use the correct time e.g. Posted Wed 02 Jul 2008 14:13:17 BST. +The resulting page is rendered with f1 above f2, seemingly not using the meta directive information: . The footer in the inline pages does use the correct time e.g. Posted Wed 02 Jul 2008 14:13:17 BST. If I instead include them using creation_year in the pagespec, they are ordered correctly. -I'm working on importing a blosxom site into ikiwiki. I'll try and reproduce this online. + contains the src used to reproduce this, the precise ikiwiki invocation (inside Makefile) and the results (dest). -- [[JonDowland]] -- 2.26.2