From aebd273d078809a129f9ffa862476bcb038ffb68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Felipe Contreras Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 17:43:39 +1900 Subject: [PATCH] RE: Final call for news for 0.18 --- 0a/0b8da812b063c3b2fff32725b4352798140cdf | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 0a/0b8da812b063c3b2fff32725b4352798140cdf diff --git a/0a/0b8da812b063c3b2fff32725b4352798140cdf b/0a/0b8da812b063c3b2fff32725b4352798140cdf new file mode 100644 index 000000000..43fdb1819 --- /dev/null +++ b/0a/0b8da812b063c3b2fff32725b4352798140cdf @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A9B431FBD + for ; Thu, 1 May 2014 15:54:26 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id IvC8gQgHIkfe for ; + Thu, 1 May 2014 15:54:20 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com + [209.85.214.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9971B431FAF + for ; Thu, 1 May 2014 15:54:20 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id va2so1040510obc.37 + for ; Thu, 01 May 2014 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject + :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; + bh=l01SbJ7Xs8+3AvbqwG6yvxsXmt152wGSmcphIHWV4pc=; + b=FWclwMIUXlF1Y5PCWiEYK1cNTOUyj0gEm5i5wTXjrwFr04aSuRcoB9lB5d1xlGO0EQ + Rrti6SmOb5DgAyW+epfjwC/HUiPWz6SNKne6EAwuWFYvE/c5IaJ8XZNJEQQNwt4uBYMM + CCvcKuV40rc0z51xVItqpCJPey3QHZYLAQxICLpO+W900ACecCfw9ZN6lLUb2jiUMkdX + SoM0rMAw7O8SmEMHLTWRXv95WvUtWSskjGITaC+pkR6rEyPFbEjiZHNGYK5EdpAfqflF + GY6UzGeYCYDHlsj2Ia27ZEMEtrgdgHG/EdJD6JEsGYP6V1p3sXaFoFQfwqAcdqR2zrhC + 0FTw== +X-Received: by 10.60.74.195 with SMTP id w3mr13577944oev.28.1398984858010; + Thu, 01 May 2014 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm122156535oej.5.2014.05.01.15.54.15 + for + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Thu, 01 May 2014 15:54:16 -0700 (PDT) +Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 17:43:39 -0500 +From: Felipe Contreras +To: Tomi Ollila , + Felipe Contreras , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Message-ID: <5362ce1b9dba0_569a13852ecab@nysa.notmuch> +In-Reply-To: +References: <1398899916-18352-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> + <5361893877282_39b4d8330851@nysa.notmuch> + +Subject: RE: Final call for news for 0.18 +Mime-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 22:54:26 -0000 + +Tomi Ollila wrote: +> In general these patches: +> +> id:1398289784-18203-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com +> id:1398289784-18203-3-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com +> id:1398289784-18203-4-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com +> +> has something lacking in the commit messages; none of these indicate that +> these are vim patches in the subject line. + +Agh, I ported them from my standalone repo and forgot to do that. + +> Also NEWS for these changes are missing. + +Shouldn't the NEWS be written by the maintainers? In fact, aren't they +the ones that decide if something is worth mentioning in the NEWS or +not? + +> I personally don't see these patches being important enough to hinder +> 0.18 release timeline -- + +Well, if your mails had ever been rejected from vger.kernel.org because +of the format you might see that. + +> these patches should just have come earlier... + +Yes. + +> ... but if you had a good case, fix these things (quickly!) and had +> strong backing from some other notmuch-vim users I could see a small +> chance of these being part of the next release... + +All right. + +> PS: does vim frontend lack id:message-id feature -- + +What feature? + +-- +Felipe Contreras -- 2.26.2