From a300328d379cc984c785ae66ca86c63488903413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:32:32 +2100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Python Bindings missing on PyPI --- b6/77f1c5a553bbc71cbba4c1a1d3b9d25befffa7 | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) create mode 100644 b6/77f1c5a553bbc71cbba4c1a1d3b9d25befffa7 diff --git a/b6/77f1c5a553bbc71cbba4c1a1d3b9d25befffa7 b/b6/77f1c5a553bbc71cbba4c1a1d3b9d25befffa7 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9ed6fc682 --- /dev/null +++ b/b6/77f1c5a553bbc71cbba4c1a1d3b9d25befffa7 @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394DC431FBD + for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -2.3 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 9EzY-mjuU3qi for ; + Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:44 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B3E431FB6 + for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4KEWdZ5002916; + Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:39 -0300 +Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net + ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa + (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1UeR8g-0006y6-RF; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:39 -0300 +Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1UeR8b-00061R-4T; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:33 -0300 +From: David Bremner +To: Patrick Gerken , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: Python Bindings missing on PyPI +In-Reply-To: <20130520141459.30749.80963@mini> +References: <20130520141459.30749.80963@mini> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+84~g12d5e4e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:32 -0300 +Message-ID: <87zjvp90xr.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-Spam_bar: - +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:32:49 -0000 + +Patrick Gerken writes: +> +> Is there any rationale that prevents registering the python bindings +> on pypi? +> If this is only because of missing maintainer, would anybody +> object if I put the bindings on pypi? + +I imagine the python bindings are pretty dependent on the version of +notmuch they ship with; I'm not sure how well shipping them +independently will work out. + +That said, whatever you and Justus (who maintains the python bindings in +notmuch) agree on is probably fine with the rest of us. + +d + -- 2.26.2