From a13038458fc5712ec651f8afb6a58fe3c4fb21f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@ http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:21:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] attempt to clear up the bugs list a bit

---
 doc/bugs/map_fails_to_close_ul_element_for_empty_list.mdwn | 5 +++++
 doc/bugs/prettydate_with_weekday-date_inconsistency.mdwn   | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/bugs/map_fails_to_close_ul_element_for_empty_list.mdwn b/doc/bugs/map_fails_to_close_ul_element_for_empty_list.mdwn
index b1f8ed2b3..4ce257252 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/map_fails_to_close_ul_element_for_empty_list.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/map_fails_to_close_ul_element_for_empty_list.mdwn
@@ -33,3 +33,8 @@ Patch[[!tag patch]]:
      
 
 -- [[Jon]]
+
+> Strictly speaking, a `<ul>` with no `<li>`s isn't valid HTML either...
+> could `map` instead delay emitting the first `<ul>` until it determines that
+> it will have at least one item? Perhaps refactoring that function into
+> something easier to regression-test would be useful. --[[smcv]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/prettydate_with_weekday-date_inconsistency.mdwn b/doc/bugs/prettydate_with_weekday-date_inconsistency.mdwn
index 111ade8dd..430d65a3f 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/prettydate_with_weekday-date_inconsistency.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/prettydate_with_weekday-date_inconsistency.mdwn
@@ -28,3 +28,5 @@ Prettydate creates strings like this: _Last edited in the wee hours of Tuesday n
 > --[[Joey]]
 
 >> fair enough, I think I can get converted to a warped time perspective. --ulrik
+
+>>> Perhaps we can consider this [[done]], then? --[[smcv]]
-- 
2.26.2