From a0b64ab6a8b9208ed4901530aeb547158da2d113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat" Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:59:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] i hope this is not too much provocative... :) --- doc/wishlist/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/wishlist/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn diff --git a/doc/wishlist/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn b/doc/wishlist/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f9c3673d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/wishlist/do_not_make_links_backwards.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +I understand this may be a bit provocative, but I strongly feel that ikiwiki linking rules are backwards. I come from the world of wikis like MoinMoin and [[plugins/contrib/mediawiki]], where you use `\[[link|description]]`. The defacto wiki markup "[[plugins/creole]]" also uses that convention, as does raw HTML (href comes first!). Ikiwiki doesn't: here we need to use `\[[description|link]]`. + +Everytime i come back to ikiwiki, i need to bend my mind backwards to create *proper* links. I understand that `\[[description|link]]` is more inline with Markdown's `[description](link)` approach, but in my mind it is too much of a problem for third part plugins to be a proper justification. For example, the [[plugins/creole]] plugin works pretty much as expected *expect* for links, because it can't override ikiwiki's internal link parser. For me that's a huge inconsistency that should be fixed. + +If there is an agreement within the community that we can change that, I am ready to work on a migration script or even a configuration variable... -- [[anarcat]] -- 2.26.2