From 9e6141a74372dbce32ac7c50cd9f0921bd3eadcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Amadeusz=20=C5=BBo=C5=82nowski?= Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:16:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: An Emacs Minor Mode to Mute Email Threads --- 62/b02136bb7ada9ce474e0c1deda449fd18fcdc4 | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) create mode 100644 62/b02136bb7ada9ce474e0c1deda449fd18fcdc4 diff --git a/62/b02136bb7ada9ce474e0c1deda449fd18fcdc4 b/62/b02136bb7ada9ce474e0c1deda449fd18fcdc4 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eb3375204 --- /dev/null +++ b/62/b02136bb7ada9ce474e0c1deda449fd18fcdc4 @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB51431FBD + for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:16:21 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id j--pg5VJYKE5 for ; + Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:16:12 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-ea0-f173.google.com (mail-ea0-f173.google.com + [209.85.215.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E89431FAF + for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:16:12 -0800 (PST) +Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id d10so1084370eaj.4 + for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:16:10 -0800 (PST) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references + :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; + bh=k5aR/P3dZIEVvBk2dB4+g/iQ3vNiAW8ASKb0p8hvodI=; + b=dVErVNjXZt9DjFNSEiHUcgRMphAXiTYPbch4b8fzY/nHk8i58nofVDq07eu5+gsZ+D + 4bJtNhrptIFaTVHrFKJKN0oqjtyLoUiP/M4jxMdFcv5fy4SX0fbd6Os/m+yWsBPtezHk + JdPx3K1OVLzqTFw+Xbdt9WY4G23aSXxdXtdbG+5A6kL87wKQHvlzoJiD2PwghsZnsC9L + HF095seLujsQpd6QZ5vY1Zz0gEzUH9CT7dggWr9HGL9fAiS09OsrRvudxW1MiVg39W6I + 9q0xh4KyP1aaf0KIlH92ZrvZn0Q447OS/gk2C6/zV8VJ18h5AOi4Iz8X8gJGkCFJtXRd + HE1A== +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQnCablvIYw4huA3Ubhl7vq4k24nHGF7pv+HrghDRhKtm5O8XOM6I4FISNjNHn4Pno3UFZXF +X-Received: by 10.14.224.70 with SMTP id w46mr1513992eep.89.1390320969614; + Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:16:09 -0800 (PST) +Received: from localhost (217-67-201-252.itsa.net.pl. [217.67.201.252]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm16374876eel.2.2014.01.21.08.16.08 + for + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:16:08 -0800 (PST) +From: Amadeusz =?utf-8?B?xbtvxYJub3dza2k=?= +To: David Bremner , kototama kototama +Subject: Re: An Emacs Minor Mode to Mute Email Threads +In-Reply-To: <87sishs9jd.fsf@zancas.localnet> +References: + + <87iotdfnqy.fsf@raeviah.aidecoe.name> <87sishs9jd.fsf@zancas.localnet> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:16:07 +0100 +Message-ID: <87bnz5fgzc.fsf@raeviah.aidecoe.name> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; + micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:16:21 -0000 + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +David Bremner writes: + +> Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski writes: +>>> I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch. +>> +>> FYI, it seems to be similar to "killed" option of afew[1]. +>> +>> [1] https://github.com/teythoon/afew +> +> As far as I can tell, neither afew nor alot uses +> search.exclude_tags. This seems unfortunate to me, but I'm not using +> either so I may miss the complete story. + +The question is: should exclude_tags be used in context of killed/mute? +This is just for skipping =E2=80=9Einbox=E2=80=9D, not for hiding them in a= +ll search +results - at least IMHO. + +=2D-=20 +Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) + +iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS3p1HAAoJEPATRTHh2/q12zIH/AgkqvBxVZ0CcZgYMBRoPAsr +DKOtHx62VIH2dEyNjeQhxvQz7jAn2mJHhI29093gDBEc5YmfDp5winm3zrW0klnj +8OckAw/h8PApP9n8Zoi0oG7Gr7ZVc7JiFHE3L2ISTqj90VxjrEEAPdtyzPVOUO2e +wYBuXx3Es28LT/kM49CbumzTSkGpOYq45lSSZIj2UBF4LNEY1s5hpIOq/Af5rM5x +hD8YQDkV6HJ5Qv9ZyG13rJTkrSYjSLFGKKKk8+RSfqBUafkzK0GusdEWwHTFExSs +UAOv+83X6cgxjhDkkvaRNLk0jE2vJ/k0iH2ZL31MuZ/NEkyHh9l9r2egwrfbNwI= +=6989 +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +--=-=-=-- -- 2.26.2