From 9bf3296d6eadd8bb31c98afc5e4a64860dc7157f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Erik Quaeghebeur Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:35:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID --- bf/c1c906468ccee11bb7fb3df682ef01be9eb9f8 | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bf/c1c906468ccee11bb7fb3df682ef01be9eb9f8 diff --git a/bf/c1c906468ccee11bb7fb3df682ef01be9eb9f8 b/bf/c1c906468ccee11bb7fb3df682ef01be9eb9f8 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e70a16073 --- /dev/null +++ b/bf/c1c906468ccee11bb7fb3df682ef01be9eb9f8 @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60886DE140C + for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:44:22 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.721 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, + RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id valODg2EV2Qp for ; + Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:44:19 -0800 (PST) +X-Greylist: delayed 550 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo; + Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:44:18 PST +Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com + [66.111.4.28]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E788E6DE0C66 + for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:44:18 -0800 (PST) +Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) + by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE6620620 + for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:35:07 -0500 (EST) +Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) + by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:35:07 -0500 +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nospammail.net; h= + content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id + :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=TCZ + TXs0cx1sI226mD3PVmcPGq2M=; b=jqjQ8UMX3tv8f5lQNFe2m7lo7mtknxvWegZ + gcGodhmLJxb8Q0tu2W4XwISBW7WFmYyxI7OjetqWXAKaj0cANAryarPnY+aoAi2b + nZBZFXp2I/seavVtPfUNOXTUTYFaCNlVOJwAgQ/4zKW+p/AqXaloVAH8/nBTc1kz + dnM2vDbk= +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= + messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type + :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc + :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=TCZTXs0cx1sI226mD3PVmcPGq2M=; b=e2u5L + wJGqi/FBdncANinw3VVCPG1ghAaC3C6UYBHR7CGdlFkEhy47zSfCqhRB1lQf8GOx + 2ndUHl00+7Vi6QTRtbPO6YV3rvwVaxEk7uKa7pw42b8D6ihrpJI44WHQwFk5kZiz + sDnXejfW+FSz0YC6y2IoWbHZYlwqg+jVsDl8AM= +X-Sasl-enc: RG9uon+MpPgDh4AvNw4ivLHUqCxJ3K3LPHBSHicdv8nr 1452440107 +Received: from sysoppad.localnet (cust-5286ecc8.wba.access.stipte.nl + [82.134.236.200]) + by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 140276800E0 + for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:35:07 -0500 (EST) +From: Erik Quaeghebeur +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID +Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:35:04 +0100 +Message-ID: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad> +User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.1.12-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:44:22 -0000 + +Hi, + + +I've become interested in notmuch. After looking at the documentation of the Python bindings, I have the following questions: + +* Is it correct that a message's Message-ID used as its unique key in the notmuch database? + +* If yes, is it correct that two messages with the same Message-ID, but with different contents/other headers, will have only one entry in the database? + +* If yes, for resent messages (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.6), does notmuch use (the chronologically last) Resent-Message-ID, or the Message-ID? + + +Best, + +Erik -- 2.26.2