From 9ad6ee864c003157f4a2cb3bb7cdf08c0343055f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Ronacher Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:39:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [svn] small jinja doc update for "requirements" behavor --HG-- branch : trunk --- docs/src/designerdoc.txt | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/src/designerdoc.txt b/docs/src/designerdoc.txt index c872083..8856850 100644 --- a/docs/src/designerdoc.txt +++ b/docs/src/designerdoc.txt @@ -430,3 +430,32 @@ You can also define variables in the namespace using the ``{% set %}`` tag: {{ foo }} This should ouputput ``foobar``. + +Scopes +====== + +Jinja has multiple scopes. A scope is something like a new transparent foil on +a stack of foils. You can only write to the outermost foil but read all of them +since you can look through them. If you remove the top foil all data on that +foil disappears. Some tags in Jinja add a new layer to the stack. Currently +these are `block`, `for`, `macro` and `filter`. This means that variables and +other elements defined inside a macro, loop or some of the other tags listed +above will be only available in that block. Here an example: + +.. sourcecode:: jinja + + {% macro angryhello name %} + {% set angryname = name|upper %} + Hello {{ name }}. Hello {{ name }}! + HELLO {{ angryname }}!!!!!!111 + {% endmacro %} + +The variable ``angryname`` just exists inside of the macro, not outside of it. + +Defined macros appear on the context as variables. Because of this those are +affected by the scoping too. A macro defined inside of a macro is just available +in those two macros (the macro itself and the macro it's defined in). For `set` +and `macro` two additional rules exist. If a macro is defined in an extended +template but outside of a visible block (thus outside of any block) will be +available in all blocks below. This allows you to use `include` statements to +load often used macros at once. -- 2.26.2