From 8f7d7c1a00d65fcdb1482f5e8ce334be752c3db4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:46:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] er, what absolute links? --- doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn b/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn index 04c9b9e90..207982c43 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn @@ -6,3 +6,8 @@ It looks like all links in websites are absolute paths, this has some limitation It would be good if relative paths could be used instead, so the transport method isn't changed unless specifically requested. Brian May + +> Er, which absolute links are you talking about? If you view the source +> to this page, you'll find links such as "../favicon.ico", "../style.css", +> "../../", and "../". The only absolute links are to CGIs and the w3c DTD. +> --[[Joey]] -- 2.26.2