From 8f21016b0087f89bb8bd3e98e2783d41d4c2f720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xu Wang Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:33:58 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Possible some threads are not complete due to bug? --- 0a/33b11809da40b54ee3d4046d5524cc89fbec73 | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) create mode 100644 0a/33b11809da40b54ee3d4046d5524cc89fbec73 diff --git a/0a/33b11809da40b54ee3d4046d5524cc89fbec73 b/0a/33b11809da40b54ee3d4046d5524cc89fbec73 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9a3c234c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/0a/33b11809da40b54ee3d4046d5524cc89fbec73 @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42576DE1B2E + for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.203 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[AWL=-0.377, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, + DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, + RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.644, + URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 8m4wpxN10yDz for ; + Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com + [209.85.214.180]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DADC6DE1B2C + for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so66829142obb.1 + for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=l0lMVYsW5Fb9WxSpbCuAo3EUAIeIeIGK5faO7IQtE3I=; + b=z6y/fjxoS45cXI6aLsfLqlZKepUapAYuvk7w+SgO4QcUbwLqPgWIm4z7NazbM2y0av + amrJuIEVrHyOCqlNqZAkqUUr1no9Hp8oNQuhxmy+7Ka9LgQYC1SI2TPSb3Mc4H7Fu5eu + 75Kzpaw9Q7NMi9fKnrb9CAbGab9IjxWDHCye0e3D5NZqAXg4aXciADvAN8auNLwj+m7E + 7YF7wU4mVQwOm+4mIWekRJ6sxwkqbe/I/gphmbMa47txVP9YjaQ56pl0GgKcboYQY/dM + 8pApEU6VRMxtY1oWZbrkNon2dNk+ZzoykQDS6IMuPZEUnne3dIE30WRTKYT0GZ3nnpst + fCgw== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.182.158.164 with SMTP id wv4mr9403505obb.78.1442759638163; + Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.202.212.204 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet> +References: + + <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet> +Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 10:33:58 -0400 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: Possible some threads are not complete due to bug? +From: Xu Wang +To: David Bremner +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:34:01 -0000 + +On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:02 PM, David Bremner wrote: +> Xu Wang writes: +> +>> Sometimes I need to do: +>> +>> $ notmuch search --output=threads "id:MYMSGID" +>> thread:000000000000a125 +>> $ notmuch search --output=messages "thread:000000000000a125" +>> +>> In theory, this should output the message that responded to message ID +>> "MYMSGID". Sometimes it works. But sometimes it does not work. That +>> is, there exists an email where I am sure (I checked the raw email) +>> that there is a header +>> In-Reply-To: +>> but that email does not show when I do the two commands above. +> +> I'm not 100% sure what you mean by "does not show". Do you mean that the +> output from the second command is empty? or does not contain MYMSGID? + +That was poor formatting on my part. It only was outputting the id I +put into the first command. So it only showed +id:MYMSGID + +>> Indeed, that mail belongs to a different thread ID. +> +> How can you tell that the mail belongs to a different thread? + +Because when I do a notmuch search for that message by message ID with +--output=threads, it gives a different thread ID. + +> Isn't that what your first command tells you? +Well yes, but I wanted to confirm that that is indeed the reason. I +have heard in someone saying that debugging is process of confirming +things that should be true. + +Kind regards, + +Xu -- 2.26.2