From 878262d6da6c3f33c4c8316c977ce705c1d0fcf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Main Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:35:55 +1600 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [DRAFT] New features in Vim interface --- 67/d067b312559b55be1c2ebcd818f0ef671c2d6c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) create mode 100644 67/d067b312559b55be1c2ebcd818f0ef671c2d6c diff --git a/67/d067b312559b55be1c2ebcd818f0ef671c2d6c b/67/d067b312559b55be1c2ebcd818f0ef671c2d6c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..193bf93ec --- /dev/null +++ b/67/d067b312559b55be1c2ebcd818f0ef671c2d6c @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206DF431FC2 + for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:36:08 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -2.562 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id cPRXOjb3XVp3 for ; + Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:36:04 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0325431FAF + for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:36:04 -0800 (PST) +Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com + (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) + by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0HIZxeS000923 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 + verify=FAIL); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:36:01 -0500 +Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-116.phx2.redhat.com + [10.3.113.116]) + by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP + id t0HIZuDw020816 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); + Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:35:57 -0500 +Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:35:55 -0800 +From: Ian Main +To: Bartosz Telenczuk +Message-ID: <54baab8b98d73_4d4183732c88@ovo.mains.priv.notmuch> +In-Reply-To: <54b29932104b5_28e3fead90a21f8e4@bts-MacBook-Pro.local.notmuch> +References: <1420891384-992-1-git-send-email-telenczuk@unic.cnrs-gif.fr> + <87a91qi6xt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> + <54b29932104b5_28e3fead90a21f8e4@bts-MacBook-Pro.local.notmuch> +Subject: Re: [DRAFT] New features in Vim interface +Mime-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Attach: +X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Bartosz +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:36:08 -0000 + +Bartosz Telenczuk wrote: +> Dear David, +> (CC Ian and Franz) +> +> > Before Christmas we had a flurry of patches from Ian Main (in copy). I +> > think there is some functionality overlap with what you proposed. As far +> > as I know Ian has mainly been working on his private fork of the vim +> > client, but maybe if the two (or three, including Franz) of you can work +> > together to review each other's patches and polish things we can get +> > some of these things upstream. +> +> Thanks a lot for pointing me to Ian's patches. Indeed, some of the functionality overlaps; this only means that these features are on everyone wishlist. I will be happy to help Ian and Franz get these patches upstream. +> +> I am not familiar with the review process at NM. If someone could help me to get started, I will be much obliged. +> +> Yours, +> +> Bartoz + +Yeah that would be ideal. Franz and I have been working in a github repo here: + +https://github.com/imain/notmuch-vim + +There are a huge number of changes from what is in the notmuch tree though. +The idea of splitting out the patches and getting them in here is a bit +daunting but we could certainly try. We also really wanted to refactor the +code but the pace has slowed now; probably because the client is very usable as +it is :). + +Let me know what you think of the code base and if you are willing to help out +with merging the changes (lots of reviews I think mostly). + + Ian + -- 2.26.2