From 8420ba10358dcc1d0d306dd1298f07fae2150e11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Wolfe Gordon Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:32:41 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] test: Add broken tests for new emacs reply functionality Add tests for creating nice replies to multipart messages, including those with HTML parts. These tests are expected to fail for now. --- test/emacs | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/emacs b/test/emacs index 29a489c7..01afdb6c 100755 --- a/test/emacs +++ b/test/emacs @@ -273,6 +273,103 @@ On 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 -0000, Notmuch Test Suite w EOF test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED +test_begin_subtest "Reply within emacs to a multipart/mixed message" +test_subtest_known_broken +test_emacs '(notmuch-show "id:20091118002059.067214ed@hikari") + (notmuch-show-reply) + (test-output)' +cat <EXPECTED +From: Notmuch Test Suite +To: Adrian Perez de Castro , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [notmuch] Introducing myself +In-Reply-To: <20091118002059.067214ed@hikari> +Fcc: ${MAIL_DIR}/sent +--text follows this line-- +Adrian Perez de Castro writes: + +> Hello to all, +> +> I have just heard about Not Much today in some random Linux-related news +> site (LWN?), my name is Adrian Perez and I work as systems administrator +> (although I can do some code as well :P). I have always thought that the +> ideas behind Sup were great, but after some time using it, I got tired of +> the oddities that it has. I also do not like doing things like having to +> install Ruby just for reading and sorting mails. Some time ago I thought +> about doing something like Not Much and in fact I played a bit with the +> Python+Xapian and the Python+Whoosh combinations, because I find relaxing +> to code things in Python when I am not working and also it is installed +> by default on most distribution. I got to have some mailboxes indexed and +> basic searching working a couple of months ago. Lately I have been very +> busy and had no time for coding, and them... boom! Not Much appears -- and +> it is almost exactly what I was trying to do, but faster. I have been +> playing a bit with Not Much today, and I think it has potential. +> +> Also, I would like to share one idea I had in mind, that you might find +> interesting: One thing I have found very annoying is having to re-tag my +> mail when the indexes get b0rked (it happened a couple of times to me while +> using Sup), so I was planning to mails as read/unread and adding the tags +> not just to the index, but to the mail text itself, e.g. by adding a +> "X-Tags" header field or by reusing the "Keywords" one. This way, the index +> could be totally recreated by re-reading the mail directories, and this +> would also allow to a tools like OfflineIMAP [1] to get the mails into a +> local maildir, tagging and indexing the mails with the e-mail reader and +> then syncing back the messages with the "X-Tags" header to the IMAP server. +> This would allow to use the mail reader from a different computer and still +> have everything tagged finely. +> +> Best regards, +> +> +> --- +> [1] http://software.complete.org/software/projects/show/offlineimap +> +> -- +> Adrian Perez de Castro +> Igalia - Free Software Engineering +> _______________________________________________ +> notmuch mailing list +> notmuch@notmuchmail.org +> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch +EOF +test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED + +test_begin_subtest "Reply within emacs to a multipart/alternative message" +test_subtest_known_broken +test_emacs '(notmuch-show "id:cf0c4d610911171136h1713aa59w9cf9aa31f052ad0a@mail.gmail.com") + (notmuch-show-reply) + (test-output)' +cat <EXPECTED +From: Notmuch Test Suite +To: Alex Botero-Lowry , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [notmuch] preliminary FreeBSD support +In-Reply-To: +Fcc: ${MAIL_DIR}/sent +--text follows this line-- +Alex Botero-Lowry writes: + +> I saw the announcement this morning, and was very excited, as I had been +> hoping sup would be turned into a library, +> since I like the concept more than the UI (I'd rather an emacs interface). +> +> I did a preliminary compile which worked out fine, but +> sysconf(_SC_SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX) returns -1 on +> FreeBSD, so notmuch_config_open segfaulted. +> +> Attached is a patch that supplies a default buffer size of 64 in cases where +> -1 is returned. +> +> http://www.opengroup.org/austin/docs/austin_328.txt - seems to indicate this +> is acceptable behavior, +> and http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-bugs/2006/06/07/msg016808.htmlspecifically +> uses 64 as the +> buffer size. +> _______________________________________________ +> notmuch mailing list +> notmuch@notmuchmail.org +> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch +EOF +test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED + test_begin_subtest "Quote MML tags in reply" message_id='test-emacs-mml-quoting@message.id' add_message [id]="$message_id" \ -- 2.26.2