From 7a7623df4ae331635592a75b4d8bf26f046e0a6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:20:47 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Breaking a really long thread --- 44/dcdeeca8bcdbcff1506648fc0e52df91f5e271 | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 44/dcdeeca8bcdbcff1506648fc0e52df91f5e271 diff --git a/44/dcdeeca8bcdbcff1506648fc0e52df91f5e271 b/44/dcdeeca8bcdbcff1506648fc0e52df91f5e271 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a52095d97 --- /dev/null +++ b/44/dcdeeca8bcdbcff1506648fc0e52df91f5e271 @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC516DE02DD + for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:32:58 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0.476 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.627, + DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.103] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id av1qcVqfF91j for ; + Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:32:50 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CC56DE02BF + for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:32:50 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fifthhorseman.net (ool-6c3a0662.static.optonline.net + [108.58.6.98]) + by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DADDFED8; + Sat, 9 Apr 2016 14:32:39 -0400 (EDT) +Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) + id D45AE20B12; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 08:20:47 -0300 (BRT) +From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor +To: David Mazieres expires 2016-07-03 PDT + , + Mark Walters , Eric , + notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: Breaking a really long thread +In-Reply-To: <87wpoc7hf8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +References: + <87k2kd8r6d.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87wpoc7hf8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+124~gbf604e9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:20:47 -0400 +Message-ID: <8760vrm3jk.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 18:32:58 -0000 + +On Tue 2016-04-05 01:28:43 -0400, David Mazieres wrote: +> Arguably, I would say either both the In-Reply-To and the References +> header should be hidden or neither. Otherwise, what was happening is +> that I was deleting the In-Reply-To header as it was the only one I saw, +> and figuring that maybe References was adjusted after the fact based on +> In-Reply-To. After all, the message buffer doesn't keep track of the +> parent message. +> +> Unless there's a reason that someone would want to alter In-Reply-To +> without altering References, it doesn't make sense to show one without +> the other. + +I think i agree with David here, but the fact is that +message-hidden-headers is derived directly from emacs (in message.el), +and isn't part of notmuch-emacs at all. + +Are these changes worth addressing upstream? + + --dkg -- 2.26.2