From 6fead140d810c5e5e90b1be6fb9d1ada97a96ab8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jon Dowland Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:05:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] adjustments to my comment --- doc/todo/allow_site-wide_meta_definitions.mdwn | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/allow_site-wide_meta_definitions.mdwn b/doc/todo/allow_site-wide_meta_definitions.mdwn index 18508255e..9da0dddf8 100644 --- a/doc/todo/allow_site-wide_meta_definitions.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/allow_site-wide_meta_definitions.mdwn @@ -114,11 +114,12 @@ definitions essentially. >> basis. >> >> Less so, description (due to its impact on map); openid (why would ->> someone want more than one URI to act as an openid endpoint, delegating ->> to the same place?); updated. +>> someone want more than one URI to act as an openid endpoint to the same +>> place?); updated. I can almost see why someone might want to set a global +>> updated value. Almost. >> >> Not useful are permalink, date, stylesheet (you already have a global ->> stylesheet), link, redir, guid, updated. +>> stylesheet), link, redir, and guid. >> >> In other words, the limitations of my first patch that [[smcv]] outlined >> are only relevant to defined fields that you wouldn't want to specify a -- 2.26.2