From 6d2abedb6247c806f8a8c64e76a3cf6a690fb8f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Edmondson Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:00:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] emacs: show: redesign unread/read logic --- 61/d560cef11c91ee9651136729d4642c70e9a0c8 | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) create mode 100644 61/d560cef11c91ee9651136729d4642c70e9a0c8 diff --git a/61/d560cef11c91ee9651136729d4642c70e9a0c8 b/61/d560cef11c91ee9651136729d4642c70e9a0c8 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..62d67e754 --- /dev/null +++ b/61/d560cef11c91ee9651136729d4642c70e9a0c8 @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12B0431FBF + for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 06:00:44 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 7WdKT-wxY89W for ; + Fri, 9 May 2014 06:00:40 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com + [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012A0431FBC + for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 06:00:39 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x48so3855121wes.22 + for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent + :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; + bh=rNiSJTRudeJRf4cvLHvZKwT0VeE2gEyThJiyJWWmfEI=; + b=PnccJYsRtuaWz4OHFBb7P1TBUOyZPyHORpZLWsXn6J4DVzJJiSY1DDV+mCr4ELdLAc + 3GyE8NwOHJQTMC/FW1spbWUTlJBYyzQt9FRRH4k8jI8T5t8HqRWxwB6j+D7a6OrJoDhK + VaUSnJRacKg6hodnnIUh23bRgLUnydKcrHSiUrw3qMrjLDtWrO63e8M8OFokfo1n9kDE + PXJRdw6qGNBPs8T93vZg2fRPrtOMTA1k568JjhZGSLaqnBal+9JmE1UwEhJHyLrC/5dv + KFyZRgovuDL4+BH3TYCwMBvkdqL2aZanT2kxYlbL8cQb5A15HWmnf7SCfkWMKZdDGGSa + PB6w== +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQl5QF1lZm+fUVSbVzfRFf35FXqw36irDFLprP3+fygu6rK3E7eLoLdLaigWN5OQyFM7q8pX +X-Received: by 10.194.203.42 with SMTP id kn10mr2477602wjc.54.1399640438787; + Fri, 09 May 2014 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:a288:b4ff:fe8a:77d8]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm5031835wiz.1.2014.05.09.06.00.36 + for + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Fri, 09 May 2014 06:00:36 -0700 (PDT) +To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] emacs: show: redesign unread/read logic +In-Reply-To: <87d2fnmbrg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +References: <1399594808-2815-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> + + <87d2fnmbrg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +From: David Edmondson +Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:00:31 +0100 +Message-ID: +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; + micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 13:00:45 -0000 + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: text/plain + +On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote: +>> Just to confirm: you can get your desired behaviour by writing an +>> alternative `notmuch-show-mark-read-function'? +> +> Yes I can confirm that. So if this went in I can get the behaviour of +> the earlier series without needing to patch notmuch. +> +> We can decide later if we want to include it (and other possible mark +> read functions) as an option, or as a contrib file, or just on the +> wiki. + +I think that it would be convenient to include a function that +implements your preferred behaviour so that others can decide how they +would like it to behave. + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v1 + +iKYEARECAGYFAlNs0W9fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl +bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDc1M0Y5NDJDMEExNjc3MDE4OURGMUYyMDY5 +RUNEMEFCRjA0OTY1MTYACgkQaezQq/BJZRbEhACfZ/c48aNn69F7JHkHFHPON4g7 +p+EAnRgxggMbXDIj+DV7Q2Y2f1X/qzby +=LLW6 +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +--=-=-=-- -- 2.26.2