From 6c21868e3f89fd5787f70c020a5d8fb908c4b1fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "W. Trevor King" Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:23:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update Gompertz posts to point to sawsim and mention better parameter estimation. --- posts/Giving_up_on_Gompertz_theory.mdwn | 9 +++++++++ posts/Gompertz_paper.mdwn | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/posts/Giving_up_on_Gompertz_theory.mdwn b/posts/Giving_up_on_Gompertz_theory.mdwn index 9fa672a..e3bbbaa 100644 --- a/posts/Giving_up_on_Gompertz_theory.mdwn +++ b/posts/Giving_up_on_Gompertz_theory.mdwn @@ -5,4 +5,13 @@ I now have a heuristic which seems to work :p, and I suppose I'll be satisfied w On to find out about analytic solutions to Kramers' unfolding rates. +Update: I found a better [reference][] while writing my [[sawsim]] +paper, listing the mean and standard deviation of the Gumbel +distribution. So many names... Anyway, the `pysawsim` tests now use +the [improved guessing procedure][]. + +[reference]: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda366g.htm +[improved guessing procedure]: http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/code/git/gitweb.cgi?p=sawsim.git;a=blob;f=pysawsim/test/bell_rate.py;hb=837c425eaeccae280cc7f7784d03dfcfcb03678c#l106 + +[[!tag tags/sawsim]] [[!tag tags/theory]] diff --git a/posts/Gompertz_paper.mdwn b/posts/Gompertz_paper.mdwn index df13c20..795d037 100644 --- a/posts/Gompertz_paper.mdwn +++ b/posts/Gompertz_paper.mdwn @@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ All the non-symbolic math was starting to confuse me, so I went back and Googled It even talks about probability density functions. I dunno if I'm ready for another relationship yet though, I've been hurt so many times before ;). +[[!tag tags/sawsim]] [[!tag tags/theory]] -- 2.26.2