From 687023d64c128499f31b702d582f4b1bffb6fcfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 17:15:03 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] literal folder: prefix, new path: prefix --- 2b/7bb80822839254be4e2271d963a6d5e9c56a63 | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 2b/7bb80822839254be4e2271d963a6d5e9c56a63 diff --git a/2b/7bb80822839254be4e2271d963a6d5e9c56a63 b/2b/7bb80822839254be4e2271d963a6d5e9c56a63 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eb61a40cc --- /dev/null +++ b/2b/7bb80822839254be4e2271d963a6d5e9c56a63 @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9536E431FC0 + for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:15:17 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id kLXLyJGBEFo9 for ; + Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:15:10 -0800 (PST) +Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D3A431FBD + for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:15:10 -0800 (PST) +Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1WKwg6-00008m-EW; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:15:06 -0400 +Received: (nullmailer pid 14037 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 04 Mar 2014 + 21:15:03 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] literal folder: prefix, new path: prefix +In-Reply-To: <87siqxiwlc.fsf@nikula.org> +References: + <87mwh8mn58.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87siqxiwlc.fsf@nikula.org> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+164~gfcbf06a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:15:03 -0400 +Message-ID: <8738ix4qeg.fsf@tethera.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:15:17 -0000 + +Jani Nikula writes: + +> +> I think we should use the prereq mechanism in the tests to check if a +> required test database is in place, skipping the test if not. This +> should be fairly straightforward to do, and does not care *how* the test +> database is to be fetched. (I'm undecided whether the test should verify +> the checksum, or the part that fetches the database. Minor detail.) + +Yep, prereqs sounds fine. SHA256 verification is pretty fast (on the +scale of test suite operations), so I'd lean to doing it late, but +I could be convinced otherwise. + +> +> I know git annex in principle, but don't have any practical experience +> with it. I don't really have any ideas for that. + +Well, if you don't mind the rest of the setup (SHA256 sums checked, +tarballs fetched if needed), we can forge ahead for now. + +d -- 2.26.2