From 66fa5826f35aaa2b609bb86f67c3df887bad1e09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:27:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] a branch to change pagenames semantics exists --- ..._pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn b/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn index c2f560e64..70b06a951 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/nonexistent_pages_in_inline_pagenames_do_not_add_a_dependency.mdwn @@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ I think the presence dependency is probably the cleanest approach? > I think it was possibly a mistake to use wikilink style lookup for > `pagenames`. --[[Joey]] + +[[!tag patch]] [[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/literal-pagenames author="[[smcv]]"]] +>> I used the linking rules to make references to +>> "nearby" pages convenient, but if you'd prefer "absolute" +>> semantics, my `ready/literal-pagenames` branch does that. For +>> my main use-case for `pagenames` ([[plugins/contrib/album]]) +>> it's fine either way. --[[smcv]] -- 2.26.2