From 62c3c7db1663f17313f17467e453c24ba53fd178 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "W. Trevor King" Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:20:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Use 'behavior' instead of 'behaviour' US instead of British spelling. Thanks Mom! --- outline.org | 2 +- src/calibcant/overview.tex | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/outline.org b/outline.org index 2b02850..09028c3 100644 --- a/outline.org +++ b/outline.org @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ http://www.weibull.com/LifeDataWeb/nonparametric_analysis.htm * Measurements ** Temperature dependent energy landscape roughness -** Effect of cantilever stiffness on unfolding behaviour +** Effect of cantilever stiffness on unfolding behavior * Software ** Experiment control/analysis software ** Sawsim diff --git a/src/calibcant/overview.tex b/src/calibcant/overview.tex index b99cfa5..cd42014 100644 --- a/src/calibcant/overview.tex +++ b/src/calibcant/overview.tex @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ the peak (where $x=x_0$). It is unclear whether the ``Lorentzian'' references are due to uncertainty about the definition of the Lorentzian or to the fact that -the two equations have similar behaviour near the +the two equations have similar behavior near the peak. \citet{florin95} likely \emph{are} using \cref{eq:lorentzian}, as the slope of the fitted \PSD\ in their \fref{figure}{2}, has a slope at $f=0$. If they were using \cref{eq:psd-Vp}, the derivative -- 2.26.2