From 5fdceb49b174fb2ece7cef07479413059f1982c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://www.google.com/profiles/schmonz" Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:41:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] response --- doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn index 1bf9a3750..e386a8d96 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn @@ -45,3 +45,12 @@ and a whitelist of OpenIDs in `locked_pages`...) >>>>> as they would then see the openid signin form when going to edit a >>>>> Discussion page. >>>>> --[[Joey]] + +>>>>>> I finally see the problem, I think. When you initially +>>>>>> suggested "a link they could follow to bounce through the +>>>>>> cgiauthurl", presumably this could _be_ the Edit link for +>>>>>> non-Discussion pages, so that the typical case of an httpauth +>>>>>> user editing an editable-only-by-httpauth page doesn't visibly +>>>>>> change. And then the Edit link for Discussion subpages could do +>>>>>> as you suggest, adding one click for the httpauth user, who won't +>>>>>> often need to edit those subpages. --[[schmonz]] -- 2.26.2