From 5f15f6c8835a195b833ed234a590a42f4190b7ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:10:24 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] web commit by http://madduck.myopenid.com/: add HTML snippet
 and slam suspision of this being display-only.

---
 ...Map_sorts_subtags_under_a_different_tag.mdwn | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Map_sorts_subtags_under_a_different_tag.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Map_sorts_subtags_under_a_different_tag.mdwn
index e5c4523e7..f7ff2dd31 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/Map_sorts_subtags_under_a_different_tag.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/Map_sorts_subtags_under_a_different_tag.mdwn
@@ -27,4 +27,21 @@ and this works, except that for *whatever* reason, it actually sorts the three
                       ■ developers
                       ■ users
 
+And this is actually in the HTML code:
+
+    <li><a href="active/">active</a>
+    <ul>
+    <li><a href="affects/contributors/">contributors</a>
+    </li>
+    <li><a href="affects/developers/">developers</a>
+    </li>
+    <li><a href="affects/users/">users</a>
+    </li></ul>
+    </li>
+    <li><a href="approach/">approach</a>
+    </li>
+
+So it's not that the `<ul>` has an empty parent `<li>`, the three tags are
+*really* children of `active`.
+
 This really blows my mind. :)
-- 
2.26.2