From 52a2a18c65215b048c9c92cfc7f398b720edf675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xu Wang Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:25:44 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Understanding the "replied" tag --- 56/56ef728345266390334b64a48dacd030d82917 | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 56/56ef728345266390334b64a48dacd030d82917 diff --git a/56/56ef728345266390334b64a48dacd030d82917 b/56/56ef728345266390334b64a48dacd030d82917 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..34aef153f --- /dev/null +++ b/56/56ef728345266390334b64a48dacd030d82917 @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DEC6DE0C42 + for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.57 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, + RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 7BbF5SVGBoSG for ; + Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:25:48 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com (mail-oi0-f68.google.com + [209.85.218.68]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2656DE0948 + for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:25:47 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by oiav1 with SMTP id v1so2176270oia.3 + for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; + bh=VLDi4erIG3/sFb335C7zmQnCWH5/7xxjHFZpJRFw6wg=; + b=f01vA1JNM6Vxkxb0P9QAlwUv712UdyLZk9+5KAW/TBRu0+2uy/8lCwEO8U37cFz866 + xloC5QgvuvFEu3JpV48geE1/ORTsyyVL5ihOMbOBDBv8FdLetXIdCrR+04DL0q+UoLlf + 2eqVDZt4aVb0oOlPOAmJwonkK5tRabZScszHX9ac5xkSNH2xJWZSLqRPvVIzVJWNp/lL + ggVxSGFDAYHUqAVksa+cRTs6Gms8XH5qhUvP5L2BmQCwMG0bWa36MZk1kedqU2kMdiN7 + rFhhdKkRxEyy5jM9+0lwEmRoUuiN2DuADfdzGsx9R2BwqV8HqEvVvwIatgxbvEbzRqBd + wiAQ== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.60.96.35 with SMTP id dp3mr8810745oeb.47.1434043544489; Thu, + 11 Jun 2015 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.182.241.167 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT) +Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:25:44 -0400 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Understanding the "replied" tag +From: Xu Wang +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:04:48 -0700 +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:25:49 -0000 + +Dear all, + +First, I am extremely excited to be a part of this list now. notmuch +has really helped me. Thank you go all individuals working to improve +it and to help others to know how to use it. + +I would really like to know if a message has been replied to (e.g. +using a certain message id). It seems that all I need to do is check +for the "replied" tag. But often this tag is not there, even when +there has been a reply (I have confirmed this through the thread +display and checking the message that replied to the message to make +sure it indeed has header "replied-to:"). + +I have looked in mutt, and also I see many situations where there is +no 'r' flag, especially for emails sent from me. + +The following returns true: +notmuch config get maildir.synchronize_flags + +So at least both are giving same answer, but I'm not sure why not +saying "replied" thread is correct. + +What is incorrect for my way of thinking about "replied"? Do I +misunderstand what it is supposed to do or am I not updating the flags +correctly? + +Kind regards, + +Xu -- 2.26.2