From 4fc9fa4f4abc640e96798f53e40bd7f70dd13fe4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:14:54 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID --- ca/58a94e75a7fe116401430d05cc93ab368d59c5 | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ca/58a94e75a7fe116401430d05cc93ab368d59c5 diff --git a/ca/58a94e75a7fe116401430d05cc93ab368d59c5 b/ca/58a94e75a7fe116401430d05cc93ab368d59c5 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f3542df9b --- /dev/null +++ b/ca/58a94e75a7fe116401430d05cc93ab368d59c5 @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E091F6DE1422 + for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 04:15:03 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.309 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.242, + RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id EtigPvWJITHg for ; + Mon, 11 Jan 2016 04:15:01 -0800 (PST) +Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094786DE141B + for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 04:15:00 -0800 (PST) +Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) + (envelope-from ) + id 1aIbN0-00062J-TT; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:14:46 -0500 +Received: (nullmailer pid 20037 invoked by uid 1000); + Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:14:54 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Tomi Ollila , Erik Quaeghebeur , + notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID +In-Reply-To: +References: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad> + <1797484.KB5JPIe8ts@sysoppad> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:14:54 -0400 +Message-ID: <87wprg5n41.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:15:04 -0000 + +Tomi Ollila writes: + +> (One thing to remember (for anyone perhaps planning to do something about +> this) is that if we'd use Resent-Message-ID: as message identification +> if it exists, then Message-ID: of the message should act as In-Reply-To: +> or References: -header...) + +It actually seems like one of the more benign cases of message-id +collision that currently exist in notmuch. The fact that by default you +see only one copy of a message that arrived two different ways is a +design choice; it's hard to get closer than the resent message case. I +suspect any change would have to be configurable, since most existing +notmuch users would be pretty surprised to suddenly see lots of +duplicate messages. + +d + -- 2.26.2