From 4eed0abc8c181a027fa802d209fd95d8c10ee9f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://kerravonsen.dreamwidth.org/" Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:23:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] response; thoughts about inline and tags --- doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn index a6cb6f8bd..953509297 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ lead to making inline too big, though. >> for inlining with archive=yes (for which I now realise "inline" >> is the wrong verb anyway :-) ) --s +>>> I think *inline* would be a bit less unwieldy if there was some way of factoring out the feed stuff into a separate plugin, but I don't know if that's possible. --K.A. + Is the intention that the `trail` part is a performance hack, or a way to select pages? How does it relate to [[todo/wikitrails]] or [[plugins/contrib/trail]]? --[[smcv]] @@ -54,3 +56,7 @@ to select pages? How does it relate to [[todo/wikitrails]] or >> does provide a neat way for it to work around having unwanted >> pages in the report, by limiting by a suitable tag or subdirectory >> or something. --s + +>>> Either that, or somehow combine tagging with fields, such that one could declare a tag, and it would create both a link and a field with a given value. (I've been working on something like that, but it still has bugs). +>>> That way, the test for whether something is tagged would be something like "link(tag/foo) and field(tag foo)". +>>> --K.A. -- 2.26.2